Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11277 14
Original file (NR11277 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

JDR
Docket No: 11277-14
20 March 2015

 

Dear Sy

This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
dated 11 September 2014. You previously petitioned the Board on
several occasions and were advised in our letters that your
applications have been denied.

The Board found it in the interest of justice to review your
most recent application based on the new evidence provided. In
this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. The

-names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished

upon request. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application and any material submitted in
support of your application.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the statements you provided,
even though not previously considered by the Board, were
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. A review of your recent application reveals
that again your request must be denied. In this regard, the
Board found that your contentions are insufficient to warrant
further consideration in your case. In the absence of
sufficient material evidence for reconsideration, the decision
of the Board is final, and your only recourse would be to
initiate action, at no cost to the Board, to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction, | .

Since ly,

ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11606 14

    Original file (NR11606 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11076 14

    Original file (NR11076 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11689 14

    Original file (NR11689 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12100 14

    Original file (NR12100 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. ~ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statement you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4331 14

    Original file (NR4331 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your most recent application based on the new evidence provided. In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2170 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR2170 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2170 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR2170 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13252 14

    Original file (NR13252 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11978 14

    Original file (NR11978 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11509 14

    Original file (NR11509 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...